<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The conservative nature of Internet 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yardley.ca/2005/03/11/the-conservative-nature-of-internet-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/03/11/the-conservative-nature-of-internet-20/</link>
	<description>greg yardley on online product management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallerdemon</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/03/11/the-conservative-nature-of-internet-20/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>smallerdemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=29#comment-28</guid>
		<description>There is the question of audience, certainly.  It&#039;s one of the things that I personally like about LiveJournal.  Your audience is who you chose, not who wanders by.  You think a little more about your audience when posting to LJ if you use friends only options and group options.  If this has been posted up for only his friends, then we&#039;d never have even heard about it.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the question of audience, certainly.  It&#8217;s one of the things that I personally like about LiveJournal.  Your audience is who you chose, not who wanders by.  You think a little more about your audience when posting to LJ if you use friends only options and group options.  If this has been posted up for only his friends, then we&#8217;d never have even heard about it.  <img src='http://yardley.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northwest Noise</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/03/11/the-conservative-nature-of-internet-20/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Northwest Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=29#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Future; damn you blogs!&lt;/strong&gt;

Just some guys projections. A new generation of individuals, starting with the high school students of today, will automatically associate successful employment with blogging, and successful blogging with considered self-censorship and image management...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Future; damn you blogs!</strong></p>
<p>Just some guys projections. A new generation of individuals, starting with the high school students of today, will automatically associate successful employment with blogging, and successful blogging with considered self-censorship and image management&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/03/11/the-conservative-nature-of-internet-20/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=29#comment-26</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Greg Yardley on Internet 2.0: Self Censorship as Future Norm?</strong></p>
<p>In a thoughtful but deeply worrisome posting, Greg Yardley poses a scenario about the The conservative nature of Internet 2.0, in light of the Niall Kennedy affair: Let’s take a look at the actions of both Niall and Dave Sifry&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

