<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor, but not impossible?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yardley.ca/2005/11/15/poor-but-not-impossible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/11/15/poor-but-not-impossible/</link>
	<description>greg yardley on online product management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Cashmore</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2005/11/15/poor-but-not-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Cashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=175#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I agree wholeheartedly.  This paragraph caught my attention:

&quot;1-800 pay-per-call schemes, single use URLs, and promotional codes will sort of work today, but ideally - and to avoid ping fraud bumping up the number of ad listens - the advertising model has to be moved from cost-per-impression to cost-per-click and then to cost-per-action.&quot;

So let&#039;s say a service like Fruitcast, which currently only tracks downloads, wanted to provide better metrics for advertisers.  Would a 1-800 pay-per-call system work?  Or is this just as easy to fake as the download bot you spoke of yesterday?  By cost per action, you presumably mean tracking when a sale is made - this would no doubt work more smoothly (perhaps with a unique URL or promotional code for tracking) because podcasters aren&#039;t going to buy a product/service just to improve their metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I agree wholeheartedly.  This paragraph caught my attention:</p>
<p>&#8220;1-800 pay-per-call schemes, single use URLs, and promotional codes will sort of work today, but ideally &#8211; and to avoid ping fraud bumping up the number of ad listens &#8211; the advertising model has to be moved from cost-per-impression to cost-per-click and then to cost-per-action.&#8221;</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s say a service like Fruitcast, which currently only tracks downloads, wanted to provide better metrics for advertisers.  Would a 1-800 pay-per-call system work?  Or is this just as easy to fake as the download bot you spoke of yesterday?  By cost per action, you presumably mean tracking when a sale is made &#8211; this would no doubt work more smoothly (perhaps with a unique URL or promotional code for tracking) because podcasters aren&#8217;t going to buy a product/service just to improve their metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

