<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google vs. government  &#8211; caving inevitable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/</link>
	<description>greg yardley on online product management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: misty; indiana</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>misty; indiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=212#comment-568</guid>
		<description>In my opinion the gov. should have that info. for international safty for all americans/ u.s. citizens.think about it would you rather have our country being attacked again or the gov. know and stop them before any one gets hurt . think real hard when you tuck your babies in at night, i don&#039;t have any problem with them having that info. maybe google has something to hide. maybe it is an issue with wanting power over the gov. themselves.Get off of your high horses and think aqbout our childrens safty. I know I have privacy desires too, but my family and our countrys safty comes first.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion the gov. should have that info. for international safty for all americans/ u.s. citizens.think about it would you rather have our country being attacked again or the gov. know and stop them before any one gets hurt . think real hard when you tuck your babies in at night, i don&#8217;t have any problem with them having that info. maybe google has something to hide. maybe it is an issue with wanting power over the gov. themselves.Get off of your high horses and think aqbout our childrens safty. I know I have privacy desires too, but my family and our countrys safty comes first&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>John K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=212#comment-567</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best posts you&#039;ve ever written!

Certainly people will have to get used to being watched - in fact, the government will have more restrictions on watching than anywhere else.  Credit card companies, phone companies, large retailers, search engines and employers will have unfettered access to everything record-able.

Although the notion that left-leaning libertarians are the average drivers of the internet is unproven, it sounds good.  The are probably the ones that THINK they are the drivers of all good on the internet.

But I think those LLL types under-credit the people who utilize the basic technology to actually sell stuff. I might wonder if porn purveyors lean left, or mortgage lead marketers, or your average small business person selling on eBay or Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best posts you&#8217;ve ever written!</p>
<p>Certainly people will have to get used to being watched &#8211; in fact, the government will have more restrictions on watching than anywhere else.  Credit card companies, phone companies, large retailers, search engines and employers will have unfettered access to everything record-able.</p>
<p>Although the notion that left-leaning libertarians are the average drivers of the internet is unproven, it sounds good.  The are probably the ones that THINK they are the drivers of all good on the internet.</p>
<p>But I think those LLL types under-credit the people who utilize the basic technology to actually sell stuff. I might wonder if porn purveyors lean left, or mortgage lead marketers, or your average small business person selling on eBay or Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Leathern</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Leathern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=212#comment-566</guid>
		<description>A favorite topic of mine, as you know Greg. Have you read David Brin&#039;s &quot;The Transparent Society&quot;? http://www.davidbrin.com/tschp1.html is his homepage. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A favorite topic of mine, as you know Greg. Have you read David Brin&#8217;s &#8220;The Transparent Society&#8221;? <a href="http://www.davidbrin.com/tschp1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidbrin.com/tschp1.html</a> is his homepage. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/01/19/google-vs-government-caving-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=212#comment-565</guid>
		<description>To some extent this trend is inevitable, but I also predict a shift towards client-centric architectures for cases where people want to ensure that their activites are safe from prying eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some extent this trend is inevitable, but I also predict a shift towards client-centric architectures for cases where people want to ensure that their activites are safe from prying eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

