<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $600 million for flat traffic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yardley.ca/2006/03/06/600-million-for-flat-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/03/06/600-million-for-flat-traffic/</link>
	<description>greg yardley on online product management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massimo Moruzzi</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/03/06/600-million-for-flat-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Massimo Moruzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=242#comment-785</guid>
		<description>You nail it, Greg. Murdoch was either very lucky or is a genius. iVillage, on the other hand, seems like the most clueless acquisition by any offline (read: not too smart) media group so far. It&#039;s so bad it even makes the NY Times&#039; acquisition of About.com look smart, by comparison. At least, About.com was on Movable Type and had thus figured out a way to drive more traffic to their (terrible) website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nail it, Greg. Murdoch was either very lucky or is a genius. iVillage, on the other hand, seems like the most clueless acquisition by any offline (read: not too smart) media group so far. It&#8217;s so bad it even makes the NY Times&#8217; acquisition of About.com look smart, by comparison. At least, About.com was on Movable Type and had thus figured out a way to drive more traffic to their (terrible) website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2006/03/06/600-million-for-flat-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/merge/?p=242#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Glad you covered the acquisition, and I couldn&#039;t agree more with your ending statement about the News Corp founder. Do you think this is NBC&#039;s equivalent to Murdoch&#039;s IGN acquisition? NBC has so much content and so many incredible brands. It would have been great to see them buy something that could advance the world of digital distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you covered the acquisition, and I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your ending statement about the News Corp founder. Do you think this is NBC&#8217;s equivalent to Murdoch&#8217;s IGN acquisition? NBC has so much content and so many incredible brands. It would have been great to see them buy something that could advance the world of digital distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

