<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Implications of Ghostery acquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yardley.ca/2010/01/21/implications-of-ghostery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yardley.ca/2010/01/21/implications-of-ghostery/</link>
	<description>greg yardley on internet and mobile marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2010/01/21/implications-of-ghostery/comment-page-1/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/?p=1002#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>Hey, Kelly.  If the Boucher bill posted up in draft form today is any indication, mobile will initially be lumped under a set of &#039;internet&#039; regulations that don&#039;t fit it perfectly.  Eventually more refined regulations will emerge, but this will take a while.  In the meantime, mobile companies will try and comply with the existing regulations as best they can, to the extent they can, with a zeal correlated with the FTC&#039;s zeal for enforcement.

A Better Advertising for mobile would be very difficult to implement due to the various restrictions imposed by each platform.  You&#039;d have to partner with the platform providers in certain cases just to get the access you&#039;d need - good luck with that.  However, I believe it&#039;s doable for Android.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Kelly.  If the Boucher bill posted up in draft form today is any indication, mobile will initially be lumped under a set of &#8216;internet&#8217; regulations that don&#8217;t fit it perfectly.  Eventually more refined regulations will emerge, but this will take a while.  In the meantime, mobile companies will try and comply with the existing regulations as best they can, to the extent they can, with a zeal correlated with the FTC&#8217;s zeal for enforcement.</p>
<p>A Better Advertising for mobile would be very difficult to implement due to the various restrictions imposed by each platform.  You&#8217;d have to partner with the platform providers in certain cases just to get the access you&#8217;d need &#8211; good luck with that.  However, I believe it&#8217;s doable for Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Hwang</title>
		<link>http://yardley.ca/2010/01/21/implications-of-ghostery/comment-page-1/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Hwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yardley.ca/?p=1002#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>Greg, interesting post! You&#039;re spot on re: the lack of coverage on the ghostery acquisition by mainstream tech blogs.  Curious your thoughts on how these regulations will play out in the mobile space and who building BA+Ghostery for the mobile device?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, interesting post! You&#8217;re spot on re: the lack of coverage on the ghostery acquisition by mainstream tech blogs.  Curious your thoughts on how these regulations will play out in the mobile space and who building BA+Ghostery for the mobile device?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
